Are Medical Specialists Simply Profiteers?
April 16, 2015
Medical specialists in South Africa are increasing prices for expensive health and hospital services. They are also pushing up the prices of medication and diagnostic services. And they are driving prices upwards with impunity and acting like profiteers.
This has emerged as part of the South African Competition Commission’s health market inquiry launched in January 2014.
One of the people who believes that specialists are profiteers is Department of Health (DoH) Minister Dr. Aaron Motsoaledi. In the DoH’s submission to the commission of inquiry, Dr. Motsoaledi stated that “profit-maximising” hospitals and medical specialists had control through price discrimination and price increases with “relative impunity”. Yet they did not have to compete in terms of quality or price to attract new patients.
In essence, medical specialists, as well as private hospitals, are viewed as both the drivers of price changes and service utilisation. The diagnoses they make, and treatments they recommend, send patients directly to the hospitals.
Another person who agrees that specialists are profiteers is Prof. Alex van den Heever of the Wits University Department of Social Security. Prof. van den Heever stated that medical specialists were “the main drivers” setting prices for expensive goods and services. These included hospitals and medicine, as well as diagnostic services and devices.
It has emerged that expenses paid by medical aid schemes for both hospitals and medical specialists have increased substantially over the past ten years. In real terms, healthcare benefits paid out per month for one beneficiary have increased by 42 percent. That represents an increase from R623 to R882 from 2000 to 2011.
But the underlying reasons for the increased costs and high expenditure is not certain since the role-players making submissions to the inquiry have proposed different explanations.
According to the South African Medical Association [https://www.samedical.org/] (SAMA), it isn’t the medical professionals who are increasing health care costs. Instead, on analysis, it is the hospitals, allied health professional and other costs that use more than half (54 percent) of medical scheme “risk pool funds”. These do not relate directly to health care.
Disregarding pathology and radiology costs for the moment, medical specialists were only responsible for 12.7 percent of this risk-pool spend. In 2011, specialists “consumed” R12.2 billion while non-healthcare expenditure was almost the same, at R12.1 billion.
SAMA’s attitude is that lay and medical media are “maligning” specialists for massive healthcare inflation. However, in reality, SAMA says that from 1997 to 2013 they only gained a ten percent market share, and this included pathology and radiology costs.
Rates for Medical Schemes
It is true that most medical specialists charge more than medical scheme rates, and members have to pay the difference.
According to the Board of Healthcare Funders, specialists charge as much as 300 percent more than permitted by medical schemes. According to the South African Private Practitioners Forum (SPPF) more than 80 percent of specialist practices including cardiology, oncology, radiotherapy, psychiatry and physical medicine charge less than 120 percent of medical scheme rates.
Generally the specialists that have the greatest overheads as well as the highest “malpractice premiums”, are plastic surgeons (who charge up to 120 percent), gynaecologists, and orthopaedic surgeons.
The differences in fees charged are due, the specialists say, to “inappropriate pricing guidelines” that aren’t based on costs. The previous official DoH reference price list was set aside by a Supreme Court ruling in 2010. It is now the responsibility of the Health Professions Council of South Africa (the HPCSA) to provide guideline tariffs.
The view of SPPF is that people ignore the fact that doctors and specialists had their own costs of service. Instead the focus was on attempting to curb medical aid scheme costs. They state that medical practitioners don’t mind pricing mechanisms but want them to be based on cost and not influenced by any form of politics.
Incentives for Providers
There are a number of ways that hospitals compete to get doctors to use their facilities. These include the provision of facilities, including consulting rooms and equipment, as well shareholder opportunities and incentives to relocate.
The DoH says people must take a closer look at “perverse provider incentives” relating to “reimbursement structures”.
Netcare, Mediclinic and Life Healthcare (LHC) all offer shares to medical specialists, in terms of the ethical and professional rules of the HPCSA. These relate to both direct and indirect financial interests in health care institutions and hospitals.
Shortages of Specialists
Even though there are many people in South Africa who cannot afford to go to medical specialists, the country can’t afford to lose the skills that the offer.
Yes, South Africa has a severe shortage of medical specialists in both private and public sectors. There are only about 20 specialists for every 100 000 people, which is one of the lowest ratios of medic to patient in all of the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa) countries.
According to the DoH the reasons for this include study (as in medical school) constraints as well as emigration. However this also gives these medical specialists market power.
All info was correct at time of publishing